3 min read 468 words 4 views
0
(0)

Okoi Obono-Obla

One of the encumbrances to the Buhari administration’s fight
against corruption is aides of blemished character. And that the
“war against corruption” elicits farcical reactions is because of
these fortune chasers.

The Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the Recovery
Public Property (SPIP) has chalked up copious notoriety; perhaps,
owing to the demeanour of its honcho, Okoi Obono-Obla. In fact, it
has achieved more success in driving controversy than in unearthing
illicit assets.

In March, Victor Uwajeh, a London-based private “investigator”,
was hired by the panel to trace the hidden assets of public
officers abroad. But in May, he was fired. The “investigator”,
though being a man with a controversial past, made a startling
claim regarding why he was sacked.

Uwajeh claimed the panel was targeting opposition figures, and
that he was given a charge to only investigate members of the
opposition. He reeled out a list of politically exposed persons
that the panel had pencilled down for ruffling.

Hear him: “After meeting in London on 18th April, 2018 with some
officials during the CHOGM, it was evident that I will not bulge in
my position not to go against the ethics of my profession by
investigating only the opposition. It was the procedure of the
panel to courier documents to me from Nigeria for dispatch to
various agencies in the United Kingdom and worldwide.”

“Soon after, I realised that the panel has a mindset towards
certain individuals and groups by the documents it sent to me.
Those named in the files were Senate President Bukola Saraki, Ike
Ekweremadu, Albert Akpan, Stella Oduah, Atiku Abubakar, Femi
Fani-Kayode, James Manager, Nyesom Wike, Jonah Jang and Patience
Jonathan.”

Although Uwajeh’s claim could be dismissed as an after-thought,
but some of the names he said were in the file are the ones in
SPIP’s circus, and they are all opposition figures.

Also, the panel seems like a hound; clawing and gnawing at a
select group of people for some unaltruistic purpose. And there is
the question of why the panel is compelling public officers to
declare their assets before it, even after they have done so before
the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB). Does the SPIP have the power to
demand that public officers declare their assets before it? Is
declaration of assets not done every four years at CCB? Why is the
panel not asking government appointees to declare their assets
before it too? Why is the same token not applied to all? Or is it
for blackmail?

Really, SPIP appears to enjoy stirring up dust, much without
impact. President Muhammadu Buhari must salvage what is left of his
anti-corruption fight by calling deviants like Okono-Obla to
order.

image

Fredrick is a media personality. He can be reached on Facebook:
Fredrick Nwabufo, Twitter: @FredrickNwabufo

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin