5 min read 848 words 12 views
0
(0)

OPEN LETTER TO THE CJN! BY Steve Sun.

Greetings, Most Honourable CJN.

I have taken time to weigh and consider what Your Lordship’s
best options could be in the present circumstances vis-à-vis the
trumped up asset declaration charges being leveled against you by
certain dark forces.

In the end, I arrived at the conclusion that Your Lordship must
stand his ground and defy the said dark forces.

YOU MUST CALL THEIR BLUFF, SIR!

This is now a High-Stake Chess game, and Your Lordship must show
the dark forces that he is a good Chess player!

With the greatest respect, I beg to disagree with my very senior
learned friends and silk, who have pledged and urged for solidarity
appearance before the CCT tomorrow(14-01-2019).

Instead, tomorrow morning at 7:00 or 8:00hrs sir, you should
call an International Press Conference, flanked by your brother
Justices of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, including some
senior SANs.

At the World Press Conference, Your Lordship should in clear
terms, state reasons why you are not going to honour any
arraignment notice that may have been served on you. The reason
will of course border on recent judicial authorities which make it
clear that it is illegal to bring criminal charges against judicial
officers without recourse to the NJC first being had.

In other words, Your Lordship must make it clear that he does
not have any plans of appearing before the said CCT or any other
court for that matter; except of course, a warrant for Your
Lordship’s arrest is signed and executed.

After the World
Press Conference sir, kindly go to your office and go about your
normal business. You may also offer a light refreshment to the
jurists and legal luminaries who had flanked you at the World Press
Conference, including the invited journalists.

Let us then see if such a warrant of arrest will be signed and
executed!

The foregoing being said sir, permit me to say with the greatest
respect, that all of us who are ministers in the temple of justice,
must always guard against laying bad precedents.

I remember that as at Oct/Nov 2016 when the issue of the raid by
SSS operatives on Judges/Justices homes was raging, Your Lordship
was Acting CJN and Your Lordship told A.G Malami that the Judges
and Justices would be asked to step aside if formal charges were
preferred against them ……which led the A.G to immediately file
charges against them, including of course our own Nwali Ngwuta,
JSC, and it was at that point that the Judges and Justices were
asked to step aside pending the outcome of their cases.

So if these dark and sinister elements suggest that you should
also step aside if arraigned, pending the outcome of the case, such
a sinister suggestion would not be without precedent.

Of course I see the nexus between PMB’s prolonged refusal to
send Your Lordship’s name to the Senate, and what is currently
playing out.

It saddens and worries me greatly that Your Lordship has to face
these evil, man-made storms.

But we must always speak the truth, though sometimes is bitter;
and the bitter truth sir, is that Your Lordship/NJC/A.B Mahmoud,
laid down a terrible precedent when all of you capitulated to the
whims of the ill-motivated actions of the Federal Government in
raiding the houses of Judges and Justices and seeking that they
step aside pending the outcome of their cases.

I expected that Your Lordship/NJC/AB Mahmoud should never have
given in to such cheap executive gimmicks.

Similarly sir, I also expect that the Supreme Court should
never, under any circumstances suggests that the rule of
law/fundamental rights is secondary to national security, which
they regrettably said in Asari Dokubo’s case; and which the present
dictatorship anchors its argument in continuing to detain Dasuki
and several others.

I also expected that the Body of Benchers should never have
capitulated under pressure as to allow that young lady (Fidaus) to
wear her hijab for her call to Bar.

I, for instance sir, am a staunch Catholic. In Christianity
generally and in the Catholic Church in particular, male laity and
indeed clergy (with the exception of the Bishops and Pope) are not
expected to wear a headdress (cap, hat) of any sort when you’re
inside the church or at any other place, when prayers are being
said; but as a lawyer I reluctantly don my wig inside the church
during Legal Year commencement Church services. Hence, certain
religious observances must be subject to the dictates of the
Nigerian Legal Profession. Judicial authorities in support of this
assertion abound sir.

The summary of my point being that whenever age old rules and/or
norms are bent in order to suit a particular person or situation,
it will almost always come back to haunt those who bent same!

These are indeed teachable moments for us all and for
posterity.

God save Nigeria!

S. U. Nwankwo Esq.
Steve Sun .

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin