NJC Meets On Onnoghen, Acting CJN Tomorrow | Nairalaw

Indication emerged that the National Judicial Council (NJC) will
conmence meeting tomorrow, to consider its sub-committes report on
allegations against suspected Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN)
Justice Nkanu Walter Onnoghen and the acting CJN, Justice Ibrahim
Tanko, leadership. reports

A source close to the council hinted that the sub-committes
set-up to consider allegations against both Onnoghen and Tanko ha e
concluded their assignments and the reports will be presented and
considered by the NJC plenary.

According to the  source, tomorrow’s meeting is like to
extend till Thursday.

However, the council is expected to take decisive decisions on
the crisis rocking the judiciary so as to avert an impending
constitutional crisis.

Director of Information of the NJC, Mr Soji Oye, who couldn’t
not confirm the report admitted that the Council may meet very
soon.

He, however, said notice of the meeting would be made public in
due course.

“I don’t know when exactly the meeting will hold, but the
council may meet soon. A statement will be issued when a date is
foxes for the meeting,” Oye said.

The  NJC had in February constituted a five-man panel
headed by Justice S.A Akintan, to investigate the allegations
levelled against the suspended CJN, Justice Onnoghen, and  the
acting CJN, Justice Muhammad.

Petition against Onnoghen formed the six-count charge filed
against him at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) bordering on
allegations of non-assets declaration.

Zikhrillahi Ibrahim of Resource Centre for Human Rights &
Civil Education wrote the petition  against Justice Onnoghen,
while the Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative and former NBA
President, Olisa Agbako petitioned the council against Justice
Ibrahim.

However, the council later received a petition from the EFCC
accusing Onnoghen of financial fraud.

CCT Trial: Onnoghen’s Witness Tenders Receipt Of 2010 Asset
Declaration

Meanwhile, Suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice
Walter Onnoghen yesterday opened his defence as he called his first
witness, in the ongoing trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal
(CCT).

The witness, Lawal Busari Chief Driver at the Supreme Court,
tendered receipt of Onnoghen’s 2010 asset declaration form.

At the resumed trial yesterday, the defense counsel, led by
Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) informed the  court that they
will be calling  three witnesses in the interim.

However, before Busari, was called into the witness box, Awomolo
informed the tribunal of an application seeking for the tribunal’s
order to compel one Mrs. Theresa Nwafor, a staff of the Code of
Conduct Bureau who is said to be based in Benin, Edo State to come
and testify for Onnoghen.

Counsel to the prosecution, Aliyu Umar (SAN), however did not
object to the application to issue the subpoena compelling Mrs.
Nwafor to appear at the tribunal for the purpose of giving evidence
in the trial.

Consequently, the 3 member tribunal led by Danladi Umar granted
the application and ordered that Mrs Nwafor appear before the
tribunal on Wednesday April 3, 2019 by 10am to testify.

Busari, who was led in evidence by Awomolo, gave a detail
information on how he and Onnoghen went to Asokoro in Abuja,
sometimes in 2010 to obtain his assets declaration form.

He recalled that onnoghen had on that occasion asked him if he
had obtained his own asset declaration form and encouraged him to
do.

Busari added that onnoghen later gave him N200 to pay for both
forms and receipts issued to them as evidence of payment for the
forms.

When Awomolo sought to tender the receipt as evidence,
prosecution counsel objected on grounds that he was not the maker.
Following the argument that the document was relevant and it’s
original, the tribunal accordingly admitted the document as
exhibit.

The witness further confirmed that both Onnoghen and himself
filled their respective forms and returned to the CCB, while he
went on a later date to get the acknowledgement receipts for the
forms.

Under cross examination by the prosecution counsel, Busari, who
claimed that he has been with Onnoghen since 1999, said he did not
accompany Onnoghen to the CCB in 2005.

The witness was thereafter discharged from the witness box and
the tribunal then adjourned till Wednesday April 3 for continuation
of trial.

Meanwhile, Awomolo has decried the lack of independence of the
judiciary.

Awomolo in a statement made available shortly after Monday’s
proceedings at the CCT, said that the “Nigerian judiciary is very
weak, vulnerable and not independent”.

He said it is unthinkable that the head of the judiciary would
be treated the way Onnoghen was treated and not a whimper came from
the body of men and women of highest distinction in the legal
profession.

Awomolo also regretted that, “Whereas political matters and
election matters were treated with dispatch, and Judgment delivered
within hours, the appeal of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, 6 weeks
after argument was ordered to be kept away in the file.

“There is no association of Nigerian Judges to speak a word. Let
no public officer or judicial officer at any level, throw stone
because if not all, most are guilty as Onnoghen. Nobody knows who
is next, a precedent has been laid, the Honourable Attorney General
of the Federation seems pleased.

He consequently called for amendment of the Constitution to
place the Code of Conduct Tribunal under the judiciary to give it
its much needed independence, impartiality and to avoid
interference from outside the court.

While he argued that corruption cannot be fought successful with
corrupt institutions and put, he said,  “It is injustice to
inflict corrupt procedure on innocent public officers. God will not
allow corruption to consume our nation. The end should not justify
the means the means should justify the end.

“The practice of propaganda lies and media trial will encourage
injustice. Truth will exhalt our nation, but propaganda and lies
will enthrone injustice. Lies and injustice is a reproach. Let
justice be done even if heaven will fall and let the rule of law be
the only means to justify the end”, he said.