3 min read 450 words 5 views
0
(0)

Re-arraignment of a former Minister of the Federal Capital
Territory, Jumoke Akinjide over alleged money laundering could not
take place on Tuesday as a result of prosecution’s request that the
case be returned to the previous judge.

image

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is
prosecuting Akinjide alongside two chieftains of the People’s
Democratic Party (PDP), Ayo Adeseun and Olarenwaju Otiti.

The commission charged them on an amended 24 counts bordering on
N650 million fraud and money laundering.

The defendants were first arraigned before Justice Muslim Hassan
before whom they all pleaded not guilty, and were granted bail.

Trial begun before Hassan, with witnesses being led in evidence,
but midway into a trial-within-trial, the case was transferred to
Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke at the instance of defence.

The case was then adjourned until June 11, for re-arraignment of
the defendants.

When the case was called on Tuesday before Aneke, the defendants
mounted the dock, and Chief Bolaji Ayorinde (SAN) announced
appearance for the first defendant (Akinjide). while Mr U.U. Buhari
announced appearance for the EFCC.

Buhari then orally applied to the court for a transfer of the
case back to Hassan.

However, Ayorinde raised an objection to the application,
describing it as ‘ambush’.

Ayorinde argued that the prosecution ought to have made the
application formal before the court and served it on the defence
for it to reply.

He prayed the court to refuse the application, saying that it
should be brought properly.

His submission was adopted by other defence counsel.

At this point, EFCC lead counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo walked into
the courtroom and also announced appearance for prosecution.

Oyedepo argued that by the provisions of the Administration of
Criminal Justice Act, an application for transfer of a partly heard
case must not be in writing.

He added that the case had already advanced to trial and parties
at the stage of a trial-within-trial, before the case was
transferred.

“Whether rightly or wrongly, this matter is going through
turbulence; a case of 2016. Why should we start afresh?” he
asked.

In a ruling, Aneke upheld the submission of defence that the
oral application was like `ambush’. He ordered the EFCC to bring a
formal application to that effect.

The court adjourned the case until June 26 for hearing.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the EFCC accused
the defendants of unlawfully receiving money from a former Minister
of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, in the build-up to
the 2015 General Elections.

image

The money was said to have formed part of a total sum of 115
million dollars allegedly disbursed by Alison-Madueke to influence
the outcome of the 2015 Presidential Election.

Subscribe ToNairalaw News!

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin