British Royals Silent Amid Crisis Over Meghan’s Claim Of Racist Remark

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s monarchy maintained its silence on
Tuesday, after Meghan and Prince Harry accused a family member of
making a racist remark about their son and said she had been
alienated to the point of contemplating suicide.

Oprah Winfrey’s tell-all TV interview with the couple has
dragged the royals into the biggest crisis since the death of
Harry’s mother Diana in 1997, when the family, led by Queen
Elizabeth, was widely criticised for being too slow to respond.

In the two-hour show, originally aired on CBS on Sunday evening,
Harry also said that his father, heir-to-the-throne Prince Charles,
had let him down.

“Worst Royal Crisis in 85 Years,” read the front page of the
Daily Mirror newspaper, while the Daily Mail’s cover asked “What
Have They Done?”. The Sun columnist Trevor Kavanagh questioned if
the interview meant the end for the royals.

“It could hardly be more damaging to the royal family, not least
because there is little it can do to defend itself,” The Times said
in a lead article under the title “Royal Attack”.

“The key to the monarchy’s survival over the centuries has been
its ability to adapt to the needs of the times. It needs to adapt
again,” The Times said.

Elizabeth, who is 94 and has been on the throne for 69 years,
wanted to take some time before the palace issued a response, a
royal source said.

Nearly three years since her star-studded wedding in Windsor
Castle, Meghan gained sympathy in the United States by casting some
unidentified members of the British royal family as uncaring,
mendacious or guilty of racist remarks.

She and Harry have also had a torrid relationship with the
British press, and in particular tabloids who have been critical of
the couple.

For the monarchy, which traces its history through 1,000 years
of British and English history to William the Conqueror, Meghan’s
bombshell has been compared to the crises over the death of Diana
and the 1936 abdication of Edward VIII.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson avoided questions about the
crisis, though he serves, in theory, as a servant of the crown and
Elizabeth II is head of the British state as well as 15 other
realms including Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Johnson said he had the highest admiration for the queen but
that he did not want to comment on the interview. New Zealand’s
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said her nation was unlikely to stop
having the queen as head of state soon.

“DARK SKIN”

Opponents of the monarchy said the allegations made by Meghan
and Harry showed how rotten the institution was.

“Now people are getting a much clearer picture of what the
monarchy is really like. And it doesn’t look good,” said Graham
Smith, head of Republic, a campaign group which seeks to abolish
the monarchy.

“With the queen likely to be replaced by King Charles during
this decade the position of the monarchy has rarely looked weaker,”
Smith said.

Some royal supporters cast Meghan, a 39-year-old former U.S.
actor, as a publicity seeker with an eye on Hollywood stardom.

But the gravity of the claims has raised uncomfortable questions
about how the British monarchy, which survived centuries of
revolution that toppled their cousins across Europe, could function
in a meritocratic world.

Meghan, whose mother is Black and father is white, said her son
Archie, who turns two in May, had been denied the title of prince
because there were concerns within the royal family “about how dark
his skin might be when he’s born”.

She declined to say who had voiced such concerns, as did Harry.
Winfrey later told CBS that Harry had said it was not the queen or
her 99-year-old husband Philip, who has been in hospital for three
weeks while the crisis unfolds.

‘DEFERENCE OVER’

Meghan’s estranged father Thomas Markle, who she has not spoken
to since her wedding, said on Tuesday he did not think the British
royal family was racist, and hoped that an alleged remark from a
family member about the darkness of the skin of Meghan’s son was
just a “dumb question”.

“The thing about what colour will the baby be or how dark will
the baby be; I’m guessing and hoping it’s just a dumb question from
somebody,” Markle told ITV. “It could be somebody asked a stupid
question. Rather than being a total racist.”

Harry said his family had cut them off financially, and his
father Prince Charles had let him down and refused to take his
calls at one point.

“The age of deference, already under strain, will vanish with
her passing,” Kavanagh wrote, questioning whether the royal family
would survive beyond the popular queen.

Others pointed to the fact that the institution has survived
crises in the past.

“It is obviously damaging because anything that tarnishes their
reputation is bad,” royal commentator Penny Junor told Reuters.
“But I think overall it’s a strong institution, it’s a good
institution. It has served Britain extremely well over the decades.
I hope that it will survive this.”

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s monarchy maintained its silence on
Tuesday, after Meghan and Prince Harry accused a family member of
making a racist remark about their son and said she had been
alienated to the point of contemplating suicide.

Oprah Winfrey’s tell-all TV interview with the couple has
dragged the royals into the biggest crisis since the death of
Harry’s mother Diana in 1997, when the family, led by Queen
Elizabeth, was widely criticised for being too slow to respond.

In the two-hour show, originally aired on CBS on Sunday evening,
Harry also said that his father, heir-to-the-throne Prince Charles,
had let him down.

“Worst Royal Crisis in 85 Years,” read the front page of the
Daily Mirror newspaper, while the Daily Mail’s cover asked “What
Have They Done?”. The Sun columnist Trevor Kavanagh questioned if
the interview meant the end for the royals.

“It could hardly be more damaging to the royal family, not least
because there is little it can do to defend itself,” The Times said
in a lead article under the title “Royal Attack”.

“The key to the monarchy’s survival over the centuries has been
its ability to adapt to the needs of the times. It needs to adapt
again,” The Times said.

Elizabeth, who is 94 and has been on the throne for 69 years,
wanted to take some time before the palace issued a response, a
royal source said.

Nearly three years since her star-studded wedding in Windsor
Castle, Meghan gained sympathy in the United States by casting some
unidentified members of the British royal family as uncaring,
mendacious or guilty of racist remarks.

She and Harry have also had a torrid relationship with the
British press, and in particular tabloids who have been critical of
the couple.

For the monarchy, which traces its history through 1,000 years
of British and English history to William the Conqueror, Meghan’s
bombshell has been compared to the crises over the death of Diana
and the 1936 abdication of Edward VIII.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson avoided questions about the
crisis, though he serves, in theory, as a servant of the crown and
Elizabeth II is head of the British state as well as 15 other
realms including Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Johnson said he had the highest admiration for the queen but
that he did not want to comment on the interview. New Zealand’s
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said her nation was unlikely to stop
having the queen as head of state soon.

“DARK SKIN”

Opponents of the monarchy said the allegations made by Meghan
and Harry showed how rotten the institution was.

“Now people are getting a much clearer picture of what the
monarchy is really like. And it doesn’t look good,” said Graham
Smith, head of Republic, a campaign group which seeks to abolish
the monarchy.

“With the queen likely to be replaced by King Charles during
this decade the position of the monarchy has rarely looked weaker,”
Smith said.

Some royal supporters cast Meghan, a 39-year-old former U.S.
actor, as a publicity seeker with an eye on Hollywood stardom.

But the gravity of the claims has raised uncomfortable questions
about how the British monarchy, which survived centuries of
revolution that toppled their cousins across Europe, could function
in a meritocratic world.

Meghan, whose mother is Black and father is white, said her son
Archie, who turns two in May, had been denied the title of prince
because there were concerns within the royal family “about how dark
his skin might be when he’s born”.

She declined to say who had voiced such concerns, as did Harry.
Winfrey later told CBS that Harry had said it was not the queen or
her 99-year-old husband Philip, who has been in hospital for three
weeks while the crisis unfolds.

‘DEFERENCE OVER’

Meghan’s estranged father Thomas Markle, who she has not spoken
to since her wedding, said on Tuesday he did not think the British
royal family was racist, and hoped that an alleged remark from a
family member about the darkness of the skin of Meghan’s son was
just a “dumb question”.

“The thing about what colour will the baby be or how dark will
the baby be; I’m guessing and hoping it’s just a dumb question from
somebody,” Markle told ITV. “It could be somebody asked a stupid
question. Rather than being a total racist.”

Harry said his family had cut them off financially, and his
father Prince Charles had let him down and refused to take his
calls at one point.

“The age of deference, already under strain, will vanish with
her passing,” Kavanagh wrote, questioning whether the royal family
would survive beyond the popular queen.

Others pointed to the fact that the institution has survived
crises in the past.

“It is obviously damaging because anything that tarnishes their
reputation is bad,” royal commentator Penny Junor told Reuters.
“But I think overall it’s a strong institution, it’s a good
institution. It has served Britain extremely well over the decades.
I hope that it will survive this.”