JUSUN Strike: Time to Break the Deadlock

In a recent statement on the JUSUN Strike, the immediate past
Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner of Justice, Mr
Adeniji Kazeem, SAN said it was to break the deadlock and protect
the rule of law. He said:

“If you count last year’s Covid -19 induced lockdown and the
present JUSUN induced Judiciary shutdown, there have been close to
240 days (approximately eight months) that the Nigerian Judiciary
has been comatose or semi-comatose. This is a dangerous development
for any democracy.”

Mr Kazeem, SAN stated that, while the bone of contention by
JUSUN which was the cause of the recent shut down is the quest for
financial autonomy or independence, this agitation is not new, as
there had been previous industrial actions which led to some
reforms and peripheral changes. He went on to say that the question
to be asked, is whether the present version of financial autonomy
is working effectively across the States? Responding that sadly,
the answer to his question is no.

“In 2018 the President assented to a constitutional amendment
via the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999,
(Fourth Alteration, No. 4) Act, 2017 which provided among others,
for the financial autonomy of States’ Legislative and the Judicial
arms of Government, in line with the practice at the Federal Level.
This was followed by Executive order 10 by the President, which
sought to goad State Governments to comply with the constitutional
provisions on autonomy. Many State Governors felt it was an
unwarranted usurpation of their constitutional executive powers to
control and apportion funds, albeit with the approval of the
Legislature. Defiantly, most State Governments refused to act on
the Executive Order No.10, and this is what has essentially brought
us to the present precipice.”

The Learned Senior Advocate continued, stating that the
situation is very bad in many States across the Federation, such
that many Judiciaries have to go “cap in hand” to the Executive
each time critical funds are needed for the Judiciary. He however,
qualified this by stating that in Lagos and perhaps, in a few other
States it is not so; that over the years, the Lagos State Judiciary
in particular has progressively and commendably evolved into as
near as what an ethically and financially independent Judiciary
should be, but we must be honest to say it is not yet “Uhuru”.

The former AG gave some clarity as to how the budget of a State
Judiciary was prepared, saying: “The budget of a State Judiciary
typically starts with rough estimates or “envelopes” prepared by
the Ministry of Budget, to guide the Judiciary in preparing their
budget. The Chief Registrar (Accounting officer) in consultation
with the Chief Judge, fine tunes the draft budget and engages in a
bilateral meeting with the Budget office to further fine tune the
budget. The fine-tuned budget, along with that of other Ministries,
Department and Agencies goes to the House of Assembly for
consideration. This process is usually very thorough, and the Chief
Registrar is asked to defend the budget of the Judiciary. Revenue
and expenditure proposals are critically scrutinised by different
Committees, before the Assembly approves the budget and It is
eventually signed into Law by the Governor. The Judiciary’s budget
will typically include, recurrent and capital expenditure. The
recurrent deals with overheads and fairly routine determinable
expenses arising on a month to month basis or periodically, while
capital is for huge specific projects”.

He further explained that, “after passage and signing of the
budget, it now enters the implementation stage and the release of
funds by the Executive. It is important to note that, contrary to
most impressions, there are typically no funds ready to spend from
day one of a budget, as expenditure and revenue are based on
estimates and projections, which will not yet have
materialised.

“It is the release of funds to the Judiciary, that is the crux
of the problem that has generated the anger and agitation of JUSUN.
In some States the Judiciary has to practically beg for recurrent
expenditure, while the capital expenditure is very poor or largely
non-existent. The Executive will argue that as budgetary regulated
constitutional fund managers of revenue and expenditure, they must
juggle and manage scarce resources between the three arms of
Government.

They say any attempt to create “three heads” of one household,
is a recipe for disaster.

“On the other hand, JUSUN says the Executive should stop giving
patronising and compromising handouts to the Judiciary, and give
them what is due, which they can manage themselves, at least from
the Federal allocations. They also say a share of internally
generated revenue can also be given to the Judiciary, as and when
it accrues”.

Mr Kazeem confirmed the fact that the Judiciary in most States
are grossly underfunded, and it is the only arm that lacks the
ability to speak for itself even though there is accumulated pain
and anger therein. He said that despite the disconcerting shutdown,
people would be surprised at how much sympathy the JUSUN Strike has
within the rank and file of judicial officers and Judiciary
workers. The light at the end of the tunnel, he said, was that
while a lot of progress appeared to have been made in negotiations,
but recent pronouncements from both sides of the dispute showed
that there is still deadlock, and the Governors appear to be
digging their heels.
Mr Kazeem stated that this haemorrhaging cannot go on open-ended,
as it had caused a massive erosion of the rule of law, and a huge
fracture in the system of administration of justice. “As a child of
the Judiciary who has served in the Executive and who proudly
remains a Lawyer, I feel the pains and fears of all stakeholders on
this impasse. It is time for the President of the Senate, the
Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Nigerian Governors
Forum, key stakeholders of the Bar and Bench, the Unions and the
Minister of Labour, to lock themselves in a room and find a final
solution within a maximum of 48 hours.
From what I have read, fairly workable solutions are already on the
table, but they need quick fine tuning and concessions on both
sides. The time to act is now!”, he concluded.

SANs, Others, Laud Modern Weekly Law Reports at Presentation

Senior Lawyers, law teachers and other dignitaries have unveiled
a new law report titled the Modern Weekly Law Reports (MWLR).

Published by Doyen Law Publishers Ltd, the MWLR is a weekly law
report focusing exclusively on Appellate Court decisions.

The Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Doyin Awoyale, who heads Doyen Law
Publishers’ Editorial Board, said he is determined to sustain the
MWLR as the best law report in the country, and to make it
affordable and easily accessible to all Lawyers, hence the N1500
price tag.
MWLR has monthly, quarterly, bi-annual and annual subscription
plans, with a digital edition in the offing.

Law lecturer at Redeemers University in Osun State, Prof Bukola
Akinola, who is one of the Editors of the Modern Weekly Law
Reports, lauded its strong Editorial Board, which includes Senior
Advocates of Nigeria.

He said: “I know a learned Silk already booking for 10 years’
subscription of the Modern Weekly Law Reports.

“The cases are properly numbered, the names of the parties are
properly spelt out, Coram (presiding Judges on a Panel), and their
roles, the suit, appeal numbers are properly disseminated, the date
decided, etc.

“Areas of law touched by the cases and summary of issues raised
therein, issues for determination, the facts, the holdings and
ratios are properly paragraphed and indexed and paginated. MWLR
conforms to the radical law reporting of the Indian order of legal
reports”.
Managing Partner at Abdullahi Ibrahim & Co, Adetunji Oyeyipo, SAN,
expressed confidence in Dr Awoyale’s ability to make the book stand
out, despite competition.

“For those of us who know Doyin, he’s a Lawyer and an academic.
He portrays the profile of a bundle of controlled energy.

“He has an unquenchable thirst for intellectual development, and
he still retains energy to engage in rigorous practice. Where he
gets his energy from, remains a mystery to me.

“Doyin has brought to reality another dream of his, by
publishing the first volume of the Modern Weekly Law Reports. It
contains decisions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal,
being the two most senior courts in Nigeria.

“The summary of each decision is expressed in easy to follow
language, and it goes to the essence of the decision in the case
reported. So, if you have any pronouncement of the Supreme Court in
your favour in any case, you can be almost sure that you have won
that case”, he said.

Founding Partner at AELEX, Fubara Anga, SAN, also endorsed the
Law Report. He said: “Doyin’s life should be a metaphor for the art
of the possible, the art of what can happen if you ignore all the
negative things and say ‘I will just focus on the positives’.

“He started his law practice in Calabar, worked in a company,
and started his own firm. In the intervening period, would drive to
Ibadan for a Masters’, would drive to Awka for a PhD.

“In the middle of all this, he had the wisdom to think about
contributing to our profession by birthing, through a special
purpose vehicle, the Modern Weekly Law Reports. It’s an example of
what is possible if you put your mind to it.”

In a recent statement on the JUSUN Strike, the immediate past
Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner of Justice, Mr
Adeniji Kazeem, SAN said it was to break the deadlock and protect
the rule of law. He said:

“If you count last year’s Covid -19 induced lockdown and the
present JUSUN induced Judiciary shutdown, there have been close to
240 days (approximately eight months) that the Nigerian Judiciary
has been comatose or semi-comatose. This is a dangerous development
for any democracy.”

Mr Kazeem, SAN stated that, while the bone of contention by
JUSUN which was the cause of the recent shut down is the quest for
financial autonomy or independence, this agitation is not new, as
there had been previous industrial actions which led to some
reforms and peripheral changes. He went on to say that the question
to be asked, is whether the present version of financial autonomy
is working effectively across the States? Responding that sadly,
the answer to his question is no.

“In 2018 the President assented to a constitutional amendment
via the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999,
(Fourth Alteration, No. 4) Act, 2017 which provided among others,
for the financial autonomy of States’ Legislative and the Judicial
arms of Government, in line with the practice at the Federal Level.
This was followed by Executive order 10 by the President, which
sought to goad State Governments to comply with the constitutional
provisions on autonomy. Many State Governors felt it was an
unwarranted usurpation of their constitutional executive powers to
control and apportion funds, albeit with the approval of the
Legislature. Defiantly, most State Governments refused to act on
the Executive Order No.10, and this is what has essentially brought
us to the present precipice.”

The Learned Senior Advocate continued, stating that the
situation is very bad in many States across the Federation, such
that many Judiciaries have to go “cap in hand” to the Executive
each time critical funds are needed for the Judiciary. He however,
qualified this by stating that in Lagos and perhaps, in a few other
States it is not so; that over the years, the Lagos State Judiciary
in particular has progressively and commendably evolved into as
near as what an ethically and financially independent Judiciary
should be, but we must be honest to say it is not yet “Uhuru”.

The former AG gave some clarity as to how the budget of a State
Judiciary was prepared, saying: “The budget of a State Judiciary
typically starts with rough estimates or “envelopes” prepared by
the Ministry of Budget, to guide the Judiciary in preparing their
budget. The Chief Registrar (Accounting officer) in consultation
with the Chief Judge, fine tunes the draft budget and engages in a
bilateral meeting with the Budget office to further fine tune the
budget. The fine-tuned budget, along with that of other Ministries,
Department and Agencies goes to the House of Assembly for
consideration. This process is usually very thorough, and the Chief
Registrar is asked to defend the budget of the Judiciary. Revenue
and expenditure proposals are critically scrutinised by different
Committees, before the Assembly approves the budget and It is
eventually signed into Law by the Governor. The Judiciary’s budget
will typically include, recurrent and capital expenditure. The
recurrent deals with overheads and fairly routine determinable
expenses arising on a month to month basis or periodically, while
capital is for huge specific projects”.

He further explained that, “after passage and signing of the
budget, it now enters the implementation stage and the release of
funds by the Executive. It is important to note that, contrary to
most impressions, there are typically no funds ready to spend from
day one of a budget, as expenditure and revenue are based on
estimates and projections, which will not yet have
materialised.

“It is the release of funds to the Judiciary, that is the crux
of the problem that has generated the anger and agitation of JUSUN.
In some States the Judiciary has to practically beg for recurrent
expenditure, while the capital expenditure is very poor or largely
non-existent. The Executive will argue that as budgetary regulated
constitutional fund managers of revenue and expenditure, they must
juggle and manage scarce resources between the three arms of
Government.

They say any attempt to create “three heads” of one household,
is a recipe for disaster.

“On the other hand, JUSUN says the Executive should stop giving
patronising and compromising handouts to the Judiciary, and give
them what is due, which they can manage themselves, at least from
the Federal allocations. They also say a share of internally
generated revenue can also be given to the Judiciary, as and when
it accrues”.

Mr Kazeem confirmed the fact that the Judiciary in most States
are grossly underfunded, and it is the only arm that lacks the
ability to speak for itself even though there is accumulated pain
and anger therein. He said that despite the disconcerting shutdown,
people would be surprised at how much sympathy the JUSUN Strike has
within the rank and file of judicial officers and Judiciary
workers. The light at the end of the tunnel, he said, was that
while a lot of progress appeared to have been made in negotiations,
but recent pronouncements from both sides of the dispute showed
that there is still deadlock, and the Governors appear to be
digging their heels.
Mr Kazeem stated that this haemorrhaging cannot go on open-ended,
as it had caused a massive erosion of the rule of law, and a huge
fracture in the system of administration of justice. “As a child of
the Judiciary who has served in the Executive and who proudly
remains a Lawyer, I feel the pains and fears of all stakeholders on
this impasse. It is time for the President of the Senate, the
Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Nigerian Governors
Forum, key stakeholders of the Bar and Bench, the Unions and the
Minister of Labour, to lock themselves in a room and find a final
solution within a maximum of 48 hours.
From what I have read, fairly workable solutions are already on the
table, but they need quick fine tuning and concessions on both
sides. The time to act is now!”, he concluded.

SANs, Others, Laud Modern Weekly Law Reports at Presentation

Senior Lawyers, law teachers and other dignitaries have unveiled
a new law report titled the Modern Weekly Law Reports (MWLR).

Published by Doyen Law Publishers Ltd, the MWLR is a weekly law
report focusing exclusively on Appellate Court decisions.

The Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Doyin Awoyale, who heads Doyen Law
Publishers’ Editorial Board, said he is determined to sustain the
MWLR as the best law report in the country, and to make it
affordable and easily accessible to all Lawyers, hence the N1500
price tag.
MWLR has monthly, quarterly, bi-annual and annual subscription
plans, with a digital edition in the offing.

Law lecturer at Redeemers University in Osun State, Prof Bukola
Akinola, who is one of the Editors of the Modern Weekly Law
Reports, lauded its strong Editorial Board, which includes Senior
Advocates of Nigeria.

He said: “I know a learned Silk already booking for 10 years’
subscription of the Modern Weekly Law Reports.

“The cases are properly numbered, the names of the parties are
properly spelt out, Coram (presiding Judges on a Panel), and their
roles, the suit, appeal numbers are properly disseminated, the date
decided, etc.

“Areas of law touched by the cases and summary of issues raised
therein, issues for determination, the facts, the holdings and
ratios are properly paragraphed and indexed and paginated. MWLR
conforms to the radical law reporting of the Indian order of legal
reports”.
Managing Partner at Abdullahi Ibrahim & Co, Adetunji Oyeyipo, SAN,
expressed confidence in Dr Awoyale’s ability to make the book stand
out, despite competition.

“For those of us who know Doyin, he’s a Lawyer and an academic.
He portrays the profile of a bundle of controlled energy.

“He has an unquenchable thirst for intellectual development, and
he still retains energy to engage in rigorous practice. Where he
gets his energy from, remains a mystery to me.

“Doyin has brought to reality another dream of his, by
publishing the first volume of the Modern Weekly Law Reports. It
contains decisions of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal,
being the two most senior courts in Nigeria.

“The summary of each decision is expressed in easy to follow
language, and it goes to the essence of the decision in the case
reported. So, if you have any pronouncement of the Supreme Court in
your favour in any case, you can be almost sure that you have won
that case”, he said.

Founding Partner at AELEX, Fubara Anga, SAN, also endorsed the
Law Report. He said: “Doyin’s life should be a metaphor for the art
of the possible, the art of what can happen if you ignore all the
negative things and say ‘I will just focus on the positives’.

“He started his law practice in Calabar, worked in a company,
and started his own firm. In the intervening period, would drive to
Ibadan for a Masters’, would drive to Awka for a PhD.

“In the middle of all this, he had the wisdom to think about
contributing to our profession by birthing, through a special
purpose vehicle, the Modern Weekly Law Reports. It’s an example of
what is possible if you put your mind to it.”