We Can’t Continue As ‘Father Christmas’ On Water Projects, FG Tells States

The federal government says it will no longer fund 100 percent
of water projects in states, adding that the era of ‘Father
Christmas’ is over.

Suleiman Adamu, minister of water resources, disclose this at a
state house media briefing on Thursday.

Adamu said water supply infrastructure is in the concurrent
list, but supply itself is invested in the state government while
the federal government carry out intervention programmes.

Concurrent lists are powers assigned to both federal and state
governments and define areas both can legislate.

He announced that henceforth the FG’s maximum commitment to
states would be 30 percent.

Explaining the FG’s decision, Adamu mentioned the case of
Bayelsa state where N6 billion Otuoke water supply project meant to
serve 13 communities of 120,000 people was locked up by the state
government because it claimed it could not afford the monthly N2-3
million needed to provide diesel, pay for staff and chemicals.

“Well, normally, when we are planning projects, what we call
project justification. The document of the project tells you how
many people will enjoy the water facility, in most of the memos
that we present to counsel we also provide that information,” Adamu
said.

“You know, how many people, how many hectares and if you
multiply the hectares, it can tell you how many families are going
to benefit, and so on and so forth. But all these things are
addressed right at the planning stage.

“And I’ve mentioned in our submission, we’ve shown the number of
the populations reached in terms of water supply and so on. But
generally, you know, whatever irrigation project you do, it has a
direct impact on families and farmers.

“If it’s a water supply scheme, the same thing. Dams, okay
dicey, because it is not enough to just build the dam. The dam has
a purpose. So normally the dams that the federal government has
built, some of them have gone further to do the irrigation schemes,
some of them have gone further to do the water supply schemes.

“But most often, and this is where the actual problem is, the
federal government has been building these dams, as bulk water for
the states to now construct the water supply facility or the
irrigation facility to supply their people. And this is where the
states have been failing.

“Many states have failed to do that. And still expect that after
spending billions of naira to do the dams that the federal
government should go ahead and provide the water schemes. And to
some extent, we’ve even done that.

“I know of two places where the federal government built the dam
and the treatment plant and the states didn’t use them.

“And that is why we said the federal government is no longer
going to be a Father Christmas by just doing these projects and
handing them over to them. We have to see their commitment as
well.”

The federal government says it will no longer fund 100 percent
of water projects in states, adding that the era of ‘Father
Christmas’ is over.

Suleiman Adamu, minister of water resources, disclose this at a
state house media briefing on Thursday.

Adamu said water supply infrastructure is in the concurrent
list, but supply itself is invested in the state government while
the federal government carry out intervention programmes.

Concurrent lists are powers assigned to both federal and state
governments and define areas both can legislate.

He announced that henceforth the FG’s maximum commitment to
states would be 30 percent.

Explaining the FG’s decision, Adamu mentioned the case of
Bayelsa state where N6 billion Otuoke water supply project meant to
serve 13 communities of 120,000 people was locked up by the state
government because it claimed it could not afford the monthly N2-3
million needed to provide diesel, pay for staff and chemicals.

“Well, normally, when we are planning projects, what we call
project justification. The document of the project tells you how
many people will enjoy the water facility, in most of the memos
that we present to counsel we also provide that information,” Adamu
said.

“You know, how many people, how many hectares and if you
multiply the hectares, it can tell you how many families are going
to benefit, and so on and so forth. But all these things are
addressed right at the planning stage.

“And I’ve mentioned in our submission, we’ve shown the number of
the populations reached in terms of water supply and so on. But
generally, you know, whatever irrigation project you do, it has a
direct impact on families and farmers.

“If it’s a water supply scheme, the same thing. Dams, okay
dicey, because it is not enough to just build the dam. The dam has
a purpose. So normally the dams that the federal government has
built, some of them have gone further to do the irrigation schemes,
some of them have gone further to do the water supply schemes.

“But most often, and this is where the actual problem is, the
federal government has been building these dams, as bulk water for
the states to now construct the water supply facility or the
irrigation facility to supply their people. And this is where the
states have been failing.

“Many states have failed to do that. And still expect that after
spending billions of naira to do the dams that the federal
government should go ahead and provide the water schemes. And to
some extent, we’ve even done that.

“I know of two places where the federal government built the dam
and the treatment plant and the states didn’t use them.

“And that is why we said the federal government is no longer
going to be a Father Christmas by just doing these projects and
handing them over to them. We have to see their commitment as
well.”