5 min read 976 words 5 views
0
(0)

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is seeking the
establishment of a federal revenue court.

image image

This is contained in a document sent to the house of
representatives for consideration the FIRS said federal revenue
court would increase revenue generation for the cash-strapped
Muhammadu Buhari-led government.

image

The bill is also seeking the removal of powers to adjudicate on
tax matters from the federal high court.

Recently, a federal high court in Port Harcourt issued an order
restraining the FIRS from collecting value-added tax (VAT) in
Rivers state.

Despite appealing the ruling, TheCable had exclusively reported
how FIRS is also lobbying lawmakers to include value-added tax
(TAX) collection in the exclusive legislative list.

“The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) hereby proposes the
insertion of Section 254G to 254L in the 1999 Constitution of the
federal republic of Nigeria (FRN) to provide for the establishment
of Federal Revenue Court (FRC), the appointment of chief judge
(FRC), power to make rules for the proceedings of the (FRC) and the
Appointment of judges of the (FRC), Exclusive Jurisdiction of (FRC)
on Federal Tax Matters,” the proposed bill reads.

“The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) further proposes for
the amendment of Section 251(1). (b) of the Constitution of FIN
1999 (Amended) by removing the exclusive jurisdiction of Federal
High court only on anything connected or related to Federal tax
matters since same would be vested on the proposed Federal Revenue
Court.

“The FIRS, therefore, wishes to further request that the House
of Representatives consider the request for the establishment of
Federal Revenue Court for the reason stated above.”

FIRS stated that the revenue court can replicate the success
story of the tax appeal tribunal (TAT), which had handled over 500
tax related cases since its inception in 2019 with values such as
N75.8 billion between 2010—2016 and N381,013,087,914,25,
$14,779,158.07, EUR – 585,511.00 GBP – 11,145.00, and ZAR
644,857.00 between 2018 and 2020.

The agency said the new federal revenue court would be modelled
along the Federal Revenue Court Decree No, 13, 1973 established
during the military regime of Yakubu Gowon.

“Historically, the Federal Revenue Court was established by the
promulgation of the Federal Revenue Court Decree No, 13, 1973.
However-, the enactment of Section 228(1) and 230(1) of the 1979
Constitution renamed the Revenue Court to Federal High Court, this
was further replicated in the Federal High Court Decree (Amendment)
1991 Cap (60) LFN now referred to as Federal High Court (amended)-
Act 2000 Cap F12 LFN revised edition 2010,” the proposal reads.

“This amended Section 7 of the Federal High Court Act, (1991);
and conferred Exclusive Jurisdiction on the Federal-High Court in
relation to tax matters amongst others.

“Section 228(1) and 230(1) was further re-enacted as Section
251. (1) (a) to (s) of the Constitution of FRN 1999.”

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is seeking the
establishment of a federal revenue court.

image image

This is contained in a document sent to the house of
representatives for consideration the FIRS said federal revenue
court would increase revenue generation for the cash-strapped
Muhammadu Buhari-led government.

image

The bill is also seeking the removal of powers to adjudicate on
tax matters from the federal high court.

Recently, a federal high court in Port Harcourt issued an order
restraining the FIRS from collecting value-added tax (VAT) in
Rivers state.

Despite appealing the ruling, TheCable had exclusively reported
how FIRS is also lobbying lawmakers to include value-added tax
(TAX) collection in the exclusive legislative list.

“The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) hereby proposes the
insertion of Section 254G to 254L in the 1999 Constitution of the
federal republic of Nigeria (FRN) to provide for the establishment
of Federal Revenue Court (FRC), the appointment of chief judge
(FRC), power to make rules for the proceedings of the (FRC) and the
Appointment of judges of the (FRC), Exclusive Jurisdiction of (FRC)
on Federal Tax Matters,” the proposed bill reads.

“The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) further proposes for
the amendment of Section 251(1). (b) of the Constitution of FIN
1999 (Amended) by removing the exclusive jurisdiction of Federal
High court only on anything connected or related to Federal tax
matters since same would be vested on the proposed Federal Revenue
Court.

“The FIRS, therefore, wishes to further request that the House
of Representatives consider the request for the establishment of
Federal Revenue Court for the reason stated above.”

FIRS stated that the revenue court can replicate the success
story of the tax appeal tribunal (TAT), which had handled over 500
tax related cases since its inception in 2019 with values such as
N75.8 billion between 2010—2016 and N381,013,087,914,25,
$14,779,158.07, EUR – 585,511.00 GBP – 11,145.00, and ZAR
644,857.00 between 2018 and 2020.

The agency said the new federal revenue court would be modelled
along the Federal Revenue Court Decree No, 13, 1973 established
during the military regime of Yakubu Gowon.

“Historically, the Federal Revenue Court was established by the
promulgation of the Federal Revenue Court Decree No, 13, 1973.
However-, the enactment of Section 228(1) and 230(1) of the 1979
Constitution renamed the Revenue Court to Federal High Court, this
was further replicated in the Federal High Court Decree (Amendment)
1991 Cap (60) LFN now referred to as Federal High Court (amended)-
Act 2000 Cap F12 LFN revised edition 2010,” the proposal reads.

“This amended Section 7 of the Federal High Court Act, (1991);
and conferred Exclusive Jurisdiction on the Federal-High Court in
relation to tax matters amongst others.

“Section 228(1) and 230(1) was further re-enacted as Section
251. (1) (a) to (s) of the Constitution of FRN 1999.”

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin