3 min read 418 words 5 views
0
(0)

A woman, Maimuna Mohammed, on Wednesday begged a
Mararaba Upper Area Court in Nasarawa State to dissolve her
marriage to her husband, Saidu, for alleged violence and
irresponsible behaviour.

Maimuna said Saidu was imposed on her by her parents, adding
that she married him under the Islamic rights in Mambila,
Taraba.

The News Agency of Nigeria reported that the woman alleged that
Saidu always threatened her life.

“He does not care for me and the children to the extent that he
no longer feeds us.

“There is no peace and love in the marriage. In fact, I always
tried to endure him with the hope that he would change.
Unfortunately, he has not changed, rather he threatens my life at
the slightest provocation. I can no longer continue in this
marriage,” she said.

The petitioner also informed the court that the respondent was
not her choice of husband.

“The marriage between me and my husband was never my intention;
we were joined under the family rights.

”My family never allowed me to bring a man of my choice,” she
added.

The respondent, Saidu, however, denied the allegations.

The judge, Mr. Ibrahim Shekarau, adjourned the case until May 2
to allow the parties settle out of court.

A woman, Maimuna Mohammed, on Wednesday begged a
Mararaba Upper Area Court in Nasarawa State to dissolve her
marriage to her husband, Saidu, for alleged violence and
irresponsible behaviour.

Maimuna said Saidu was imposed on her by her parents, adding
that she married him under the Islamic rights in Mambila,
Taraba.

The News Agency of Nigeria reported that the woman alleged that
Saidu always threatened her life.

“He does not care for me and the children to the extent that he
no longer feeds us.

“There is no peace and love in the marriage. In fact, I always
tried to endure him with the hope that he would change.
Unfortunately, he has not changed, rather he threatens my life at
the slightest provocation. I can no longer continue in this
marriage,” she said.

The petitioner also informed the court that the respondent was
not her choice of husband.

“The marriage between me and my husband was never my intention;
we were joined under the family rights.

”My family never allowed me to bring a man of my choice,” she
added.

The respondent, Saidu, however, denied the allegations.

The judge, Mr. Ibrahim Shekarau, adjourned the case until May 2
to allow the parties settle out of court.

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?