Kaduna state governor, Nasiru El Rufai, on Wednesday closed his
defence before the state Governorship Elections Tribunal after
calling two witnesses.
The petition was instituted by the Peoples Democratic Party,
PDP, and its governorship candidate, Isa Ashiru, seeking to upturn
the declaration of El-Rufai as winner of the Kaduna state
governorship election.
At Wednesday’s sitting, El-Rufai’s second witness, retired DSP
Olufemi Ayodele, a Forensic and a Hand Writing expert, adopted his
written statement as evidence before the tribunal.
In the statement, he deposed that that only a few of the
Petitioners’ witnesses signed the documents they tendered before
the tribunal.
“After analyses of the signatures on the statement of oath, it
was found out that only three persons were responsible for the
signing of about 624 signatures of the petitioners.
“One of them was solely responsible for signing 471, another
person signed 144, the third person signed nine signatures, ” the
witness said.
Under cross examination, Ayodele said that he was not a
consultant, but a professional.
However, the petitioners’ counsel, Mr Elisha Kurah, SAN,
referred him to paragraph five of his deposition, where the witness
referred to himself as a principal consultant.
Ayodele clarified that he had referred to himself as a
consultant in the document as a way of introduction, but as a
witness in court, he was a professional.
The petitioners’ counsel asked the witness if he was paid to do
the job of a Forensic Analyst and the witness answered in the
affirmative.
He, however, declined to disclose his professional fee before
the tribunal.
The witness said that he had no allegiance to the person that
hired him, and explained that his testimony was given to assist the
tribunal as best as he could to make their work easier.
When asked if he knew the theory of forensic analysis, which
suggests that analysts tend to favour those who hired them, the
witness said that he was not aware of such theory.
The witness, however, agreed with the petitioners’ counsel that
accidental and natural variations do occur in signatures.
Kurah then tendered a document titled “Adversarial Allegiance
amongst expert witnesses.”
The 2nd and 3rd respondents, however, opposed the document
through their counsel.
The tribunal adjourned until Thursday to enable the third
respondent, the All Progressives Congress, APC, to continue with
its defence.
Speaking after the proceedings, Mr Abdul-Hakeem Mustapha, SAN,
counsel to El-Rufai, said it was not about how many witnesses one
produced, but the quality of witnesses presented.
Mustapha said the two witnesses presented by the 2nd respondent,
El-Rufai, had provided sufficient evidence to defend his mandate
before the Tribunal.
NAN
Subscribe ToNairalaw News!
Read more tribunal-el-rufai-closes-defence-after-2-witnesses/