11 min read 2,192 words 0 views
0
(0)

*Okeke Challenges Those Dismissing The Order As Fake To
Produce The Genuine One
*Registrar Says He Doesn’t Know Whether The Order Has Been
Discharged Or Not.

image

Controversy has trailed the order of an Enugu Magistrate sitting
at Agbogudu which remanded a lawyer, F. C. Okeke, Esq., in police
custody on the basis that his client did not show up in court.

image

His Worship Ezeobi Ngozi Anidi (Mrs) was said to have made the
order on the 16th March 2021, in a criminal case between
Commissioner of Police vs John Chidozie Igwe (CMC/12c/2017).

According to the ruling John Chidozie Igwe, was absent,
therefore his lawyer, FC Okeke, Esq, must be remanded in police
custody pending when his client is produced.

The order went viral on social media and elicited mixed
reactions amongst lawyers. Many people dismissed the order as fake
while others argued otherwise. A statement was seen by
Nairalaw signed by one Mary Bassey Godwin stating that the
order which was seen viral in the media was a “spurious” and
“fabricated” document aimed at intimidating the court adding that
“Enugu State Commissioner of Police, Mr. Muhammad Aliyu and the
officiating DPO, Mr. John Igele, have both confirmed that the order
to arrest a lawyer circulating on social media is a fabrication. It
never existed nor was any lawyer arrested.”

The Chairman of Enugu Branch of The Nigerian Bar Association
(NBA), Jude Ezegwui Esq., on the other hand said the Branch has
launched an investigation into the matter. He said he has requested
a hard copy of the Court Proceedings and/or Order of court; and
written facts of what transpired in court that day to enable him to
take further action.

“We cannot allow this action by one person to threaten the whole
mutual respect existing between the Bench and the Bar. I assure the
bar that we shall follow this matter to a logical end. In this
regard, we shall keep the bar updated. Thank you.” Ezegwui
said.

FC OKEKE, ESQ GAVE HIS ACCOUNT OF THE STORY
Nairalaw reached out to FC Okeke, the lawyer who was
ordered to be remanded, by the said Enugu Magistrate. He confirmed
to us that indeed, the Magistrate ordered for him to be
remanded.

He said the order is genuine. According to him, he paid for the
record of proceedings and the receipts are with him. He said if the
order is fake then which proceedings did he pay for? The only thing
is that, according to him, the order is incomplete.

“The order to my understanding is incomplete. Because the
Magistrate purportedly made an order vacating the previous order
but the last order was not contained in the order I got. And
moreover, she issued a bench warrant against the accused person but
the question is all these things are they contained there?”

“If they say the order is fake they should bring the genuine
order na to counter this one. The presumption is that when such
thing exists, that thing is genuine until it is rebutted”

He said for now his liberty is at stake as there is nothing to
show that the order has been discharged. He said he was detained by
the court because after he finished his matter he had to remain in
court till after the court finished all matters that day.

“detention doesn’t mean if I stay there for hundred (100) hours.
At least after I finished my matter I stayed for about more than
two hours or so.” he said

When asked whether his stay was under the directive of the
court, he responded: “the court made an order na, did you expect me
to leave when the court made an order that I should remain in
police custody? I started obeying the court order immediately.” he
said that was what he was supposed to do as a lawyer.

He added, “don’t you know that if I had attempted to make a
move, even to go out and ease myself, that even the Magistrate
would have said that I attempted to run?”

He further explained that he had to keep quiet till after
lawyers pleaded. According to him, lawyers continued begging the
Magistrate even after she finished hearing all matters slated for
that day.

“if they say the order is fake, are they saying that the order
was not made or that the one in circulation is fake? I want to know
the fakeness of the order.” Okeke said

He added, “If they are saying that the order was not made at
all, some lawyers were there on that day. The prosecutor is still
alive. Even if they are lying, they cannot get it correct. If they
say the content of the order is fake, they should bring the correct
one made by the court.”

Application letter for the
record of proceedings
Receipt for CTC
Ruling

CALL TO ENUGU CHAIRMAN
Several calls put across to the branch chairman NBA Enugu, Ezegwui
Jude, for some questioning proved abortive as the man declined with
the reason that he was in a meeting

ACCOUNT OF THE REGISTRAR
Nairalaw also reached out to the Registrar of the court,
Egwu Augustin. The Registrae said what Okeke collected was record
of proceedings, not court order.

“He (Okeke) applied for record of proceedings, not court order
and that’s what he collected from me.” the Registrar said

When asked whether the record proceedings contained the court
order, he said “the judge gave order that he (Okeke) will be
remanded in police station. I didn’t confirm that as a court
order.”

The Registrar confirmed that lawyers pleaded with the Magistrate
and at the end of the day the Magistrate allowed Okeke to go.

“What I know is that after the pleading, he said OK, he allowed
him to go. He did not go to police that day. But he told him
(Okeke) to produce his client at the next adjourned date.”

He said the next adjourned date of the case is 27th April.

Attempt to reach the Magistrate was not successful as all calls
to him by our correspondent was not picked. The Chief Registrar of
the Enugu State Judiciary, Eze Kingsley, also declined to speak on
the matter.

The position is it is now, based on what we gathered from the
Registrar and Okeke, is that the Magistrate actually granted an
order for Okeke to be remanded in police custody. However, what we
are not sure of is whether the said order has been vacated.

*Okeke Challenges Those Dismissing The Order As Fake To
Produce The Genuine One
*Registrar Says He Doesn’t Know Whether The Order Has Been
Discharged Or Not.

image

Controversy has trailed the order of an Enugu Magistrate sitting
at Agbogudu which remanded a lawyer, F. C. Okeke, Esq., in police
custody on the basis that his client did not show up in court.

image

His Worship Ezeobi Ngozi Anidi (Mrs) was said to have made the
order on the 16th March 2021, in a criminal case between
Commissioner of Police vs John Chidozie Igwe (CMC/12c/2017).

According to the ruling John Chidozie Igwe, was absent,
therefore his lawyer, FC Okeke, Esq, must be remanded in police
custody pending when his client is produced.

The order went viral on social media and elicited mixed
reactions amongst lawyers. Many people dismissed the order as fake
while others argued otherwise. A statement was seen by
Nairalaw signed by one Mary Bassey Godwin stating that the
order which was seen viral in the media was a “spurious” and
“fabricated” document aimed at intimidating the court adding that
“Enugu State Commissioner of Police, Mr. Muhammad Aliyu and the
officiating DPO, Mr. John Igele, have both confirmed that the order
to arrest a lawyer circulating on social media is a fabrication. It
never existed nor was any lawyer arrested.”

The Chairman of Enugu Branch of The Nigerian Bar Association
(NBA), Jude Ezegwui Esq., on the other hand said the Branch has
launched an investigation into the matter. He said he has requested
a hard copy of the Court Proceedings and/or Order of court; and
written facts of what transpired in court that day to enable him to
take further action.

“We cannot allow this action by one person to threaten the whole
mutual respect existing between the Bench and the Bar. I assure the
bar that we shall follow this matter to a logical end. In this
regard, we shall keep the bar updated. Thank you.” Ezegwui
said.

FC OKEKE, ESQ GAVE HIS ACCOUNT OF THE STORY
Nairalaw reached out to FC Okeke, the lawyer who was
ordered to be remanded, by the said Enugu Magistrate. He confirmed
to us that indeed, the Magistrate ordered for him to be
remanded.

He said the order is genuine. According to him, he paid for the
record of proceedings and the receipts are with him. He said if the
order is fake then which proceedings did he pay for? The only thing
is that, according to him, the order is incomplete.

“The order to my understanding is incomplete. Because the
Magistrate purportedly made an order vacating the previous order
but the last order was not contained in the order I got. And
moreover, she issued a bench warrant against the accused person but
the question is all these things are they contained there?”

“If they say the order is fake they should bring the genuine
order na to counter this one. The presumption is that when such
thing exists, that thing is genuine until it is rebutted”

He said for now his liberty is at stake as there is nothing to
show that the order has been discharged. He said he was detained by
the court because after he finished his matter he had to remain in
court till after the court finished all matters that day.

“detention doesn’t mean if I stay there for hundred (100) hours.
At least after I finished my matter I stayed for about more than
two hours or so.” he said

When asked whether his stay was under the directive of the
court, he responded: “the court made an order na, did you expect me
to leave when the court made an order that I should remain in
police custody? I started obeying the court order immediately.” he
said that was what he was supposed to do as a lawyer.

He added, “don’t you know that if I had attempted to make a
move, even to go out and ease myself, that even the Magistrate
would have said that I attempted to run?”

He further explained that he had to keep quiet till after
lawyers pleaded. According to him, lawyers continued begging the
Magistrate even after she finished hearing all matters slated for
that day.

“if they say the order is fake, are they saying that the order
was not made or that the one in circulation is fake? I want to know
the fakeness of the order.” Okeke said

He added, “If they are saying that the order was not made at
all, some lawyers were there on that day. The prosecutor is still
alive. Even if they are lying, they cannot get it correct. If they
say the content of the order is fake, they should bring the correct
one made by the court.”


Application letter for the record of proceedings

Receipt for CTC Ruling

CALL TO ENUGU CHAIRMAN
Several calls put across to the branch chairman NBA Enugu, Ezegwui
Jude, for some questioning proved abortive as the man declined with
the reason that he was in a meeting

ACCOUNT OF THE REGISTRAR
Nairalaw also reached out to the Registrar of the court,
Egwu Augustin. The Registrae said what Okeke collected was record
of proceedings, not court order.

“He (Okeke) applied for record of proceedings, not court order
and that’s what he collected from me.” the Registrar said

When asked whether the record proceedings contained the court
order, he said “the judge gave order that he (Okeke) will be
remanded in police station. I didn’t confirm that as a court
order.”

The Registrar confirmed that lawyers pleaded with the Magistrate
and at the end of the day the Magistrate allowed Okeke to go.

“What I know is that after the pleading, he said OK, he allowed
him to go. He did not go to police that day. But he told him
(Okeke) to produce his client at the next adjourned date.”

He said the next adjourned date of the case is 27th April.

Attempt to reach the Magistrate was not successful as all calls
to him by our correspondent was not picked. The Chief Registrar of
the Enugu State Judiciary, Eze Kingsley, also declined to speak on
the matter.

The position is it is now, based on what we gathered from the
Registrar and Okeke, is that the Magistrate actually granted an
order for Okeke to be remanded in police custody. However, what we
are not sure of is whether the said order has been vacated.

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?