6 min read 1,152 words 4 views
0
(0)

Olisa Agbakoba, a senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), says a
change of the 1999 constitution will not guarantee a perfect
country.

image image

Agbakoba said this at the inaugural #FixPoliticsDialogues, a
platform which convenes debates on national issues.

image

The event tagged ‘1999 Constitution: To change or amend?’ was
organised by FixPolitics, a non-profit organisation, on Monday.

Speaking at the event, Agbakoba said the current constitution,
despite its imperfections, is not obeyed.

He said there is no guarantee that a new constitution, no matter
how perfect, will be complied with by Nigerians and those in
power.

The SAN said the process of birthing a new constitution requires
strategic engagements.

He said “to force a change of constitution outside the legal
framework will be considered a revolution”.

“Let’s not assume that a perfect constitution that we all strive
for means that by a flick of the switch everything is good,” he
said.

“Currently, the constitution, imperfect as it is, is not obeyed.
So what is to say that the constitution we envisage will be obeyed?
The answer to it is something we should reflect on carefully.

“Part of the problem we face today is the process. Because the
process is faulty, Nigerians cannot claim ownership to the
constitution. If there is a way to reverse that problem by
overhauling the constitution and bringing in a new one, that, I
think, is the ideal.”

Agbakoba said Nigerians and civil society organisations (CSOs)
have the option of pushing for either an amendment or a change of
the constitution.

But he added that the process of changing the constitution may
be difficult because traditional and religious institutions may not
key into such a strategy.

“Tactically, the space to engage in amendment is there, let’s
take it. Strategically, the space to overturn the constitution, if
it is there, we can generate civil society momentum then let’s take
it. But to be quite honest with you, I don’t see it,” he said.

“There is no way to expect that the present political class,
whether it is APC or PDP, will surrender any iota of power unless
we fight and wrestle them to the ground to get it. But my point is
that is there the energy for that?

“So as we plan towards strategic intervention in changing the
dynamics of the Nigerian states and in placing a new constitution,
let’s not overlook the small advantages that we can get by critical
engagement.”

According to Agbakoba, the constitution has 98 items of power
out of which 68 items are exclusive to the federal government while
the remaining 30 are shared between the federal and state
governments.

He said the challenge is the redistribution of power by reducing
exclusive privileges granted to the federal government.

The lawyer asked CSOs to operate tactically and unite to
pressure the national assembly in amending the constitution for
better distribution of powers.

“The constitution does not permit a change so if we are looking
for a change then let’s be prepared for a revolution,” he said.

“A revolution means altering the constitution in a way not
envisaged by the constitution. That is the strategic direction we
are looking for which I will be happy with.

“But as we look for that strategic direction to occur, we can
occupy the space by looking at those critical amendments that we
can make for us to have a more balanced federation.”

Olisa Agbakoba, a senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), says a
change of the 1999 constitution will not guarantee a perfect
country.

image image

Agbakoba said this at the inaugural #FixPoliticsDialogues, a
platform which convenes debates on national issues.

image

The event tagged ‘1999 Constitution: To change or amend?’ was
organised by FixPolitics, a non-profit organisation, on Monday.

Speaking at the event, Agbakoba said the current constitution,
despite its imperfections, is not obeyed.

He said there is no guarantee that a new constitution, no matter
how perfect, will be complied with by Nigerians and those in
power.

The SAN said the process of birthing a new constitution requires
strategic engagements.

He said “to force a change of constitution outside the legal
framework will be considered a revolution”.

“Let’s not assume that a perfect constitution that we all strive
for means that by a flick of the switch everything is good,” he
said.

“Currently, the constitution, imperfect as it is, is not obeyed.
So what is to say that the constitution we envisage will be obeyed?
The answer to it is something we should reflect on carefully.

“Part of the problem we face today is the process. Because the
process is faulty, Nigerians cannot claim ownership to the
constitution. If there is a way to reverse that problem by
overhauling the constitution and bringing in a new one, that, I
think, is the ideal.”

Agbakoba said Nigerians and civil society organisations (CSOs)
have the option of pushing for either an amendment or a change of
the constitution.

But he added that the process of changing the constitution may
be difficult because traditional and religious institutions may not
key into such a strategy.

“Tactically, the space to engage in amendment is there, let’s
take it. Strategically, the space to overturn the constitution, if
it is there, we can generate civil society momentum then let’s take
it. But to be quite honest with you, I don’t see it,” he said.

“There is no way to expect that the present political class,
whether it is APC or PDP, will surrender any iota of power unless
we fight and wrestle them to the ground to get it. But my point is
that is there the energy for that?

“So as we plan towards strategic intervention in changing the
dynamics of the Nigerian states and in placing a new constitution,
let’s not overlook the small advantages that we can get by critical
engagement.”

According to Agbakoba, the constitution has 98 items of power
out of which 68 items are exclusive to the federal government while
the remaining 30 are shared between the federal and state
governments.

He said the challenge is the redistribution of power by reducing
exclusive privileges granted to the federal government.

The lawyer asked CSOs to operate tactically and unite to
pressure the national assembly in amending the constitution for
better distribution of powers.

“The constitution does not permit a change so if we are looking
for a change then let’s be prepared for a revolution,” he said.

“A revolution means altering the constitution in a way not
envisaged by the constitution. That is the strategic direction we
are looking for which I will be happy with.

“But as we look for that strategic direction to occur, we can
occupy the space by looking at those critical amendments that we
can make for us to have a more balanced federation.”

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin