8 min read 1,404 words 2 views
0
(0)

*Voids June 10 And 11 Delegate Elections

image image

A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama
has dismissed three applications filed by the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP) and two others seeking to stay the court’s June 9
judgment sacking the party’s Executive Council (EXCO) in Anambra
State.

image

Justice Olukayode Adeniyi, in a ruling on Wednesday, held that
the three applicants – the PDP, Chief Ndubisi Nwobu and Barr.
Uchenna Obiora – failed to make out a case to warrant the grant of
their application that sought to stay the judgment pending the
determination of the appeal.

Justice Adeniyi, who came down hard on the applicants for
earlier denigrating the court in their reaction to the judgment,
held that they did not show that the non-staying of the judgment
would either render their appeals nugatory or make it impossible
for the party to conduct its primary for the forthcoming
governorship election.

The judge voided all the activities engaged in by the party
since June 9 when the judgment was delivered, including the
elections it conducted on June 10 and 11 to elect a three-man
ad-hoc ward delegate that would participate in the voting at the
primary of the PDP scheduled for June 26, 2021.

Justice Adeniyi said the statement made on June 9, by Secretary
of the PDP Anambra in which he disparaged the court and its
judgment was an affront to the court, adding that they do not
expect a court they have insulted to grant them an indulgence.

He said: “The first applicant (the PDP), which is the principal
party has maintained in the face of this court that its judgment is
null and void for want of jurisdiction. The same party cannot at
the same time seek equitable reliefs from the same court.

“A party that has no regard for the judgment of a court and
described it I derogatory terms to the whole world, as shown in
Exhibit C, cannot quietly return to the same court. to seek
equitable relief to stay the same judgment that it defied and
defiled.

“An assessment of the totality of the circumstances that have
been presented before me by the instant applications leads to only
one conclusion, which is that the applicants do not have an iota of
respect for the authority of this court, they issued a release to
embolden their members not to reckon with the judgment of the court
and followed it up by taking of definite contemptuous steps in
disregard of the court’s judgment.

“For them to come back with a motion for stay of execution and
injunction pending the determination of their appeal, in my view,
is a clear afterthought. I there say that no court worth its
authority will grant aany such application, no matter how well
presented and argued,” Justice Adeniyi said.

The June 9 judgment, which they sought to stay was on a suit
marked: HC/CV/774/2021 filed by Samuel Anyakolah (for himself and
all local government chairmen and ward executives that emerged from
the Anambra PDP congress conducted on November 28 and December 1,
2017 under the supervision of Sir Chukwudi Umeaba, as Acting
Chairman State Caretaker Committee).

The judge agreed with the plaintiff/claimant that the PDP
violated its constitution in the conduct of the Southeast zonal
congress of March March 6, 2021 and the appointments made
therein.

He declared among others, that “all congresses, designations or
appointments made by the first defendant (the PDP), with respect to
the positions of the state chairman, EXCO members and local
government chairmen, as contained in pages 14,15 and 16 of the
Southeast zonal congress brochure of 6th March 2021 are hereby
nullified and set aside.”

The judge ordered the PDP to henceforth, recognise and adopt
only the list of the already inaugurated party officers and
delegates that emerged from the Anambra PDP congresses conducted on
November 28, 2017 and December 1, 2017 validated by Senator France
Bent Ward Congress Appeal Panel report and Barrister Ukpai Ukairo
Local Government Appeal Panel report, under the supervision of Sir
Chukwudi Umeaba, who shall continue to act in the capacities for
which they were duly elected.

*Voids June 10 And 11 Delegate Elections

image image

A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama
has dismissed three applications filed by the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP) and two others seeking to stay the court’s June 9
judgment sacking the party’s Executive Council (EXCO) in Anambra
State.

image

Justice Olukayode Adeniyi, in a ruling on Wednesday, held that
the three applicants – the PDP, Chief Ndubisi Nwobu and Barr.
Uchenna Obiora – failed to make out a case to warrant the grant of
their application that sought to stay the judgment pending the
determination of the appeal.

Justice Adeniyi, who came down hard on the applicants for
earlier denigrating the court in their reaction to the judgment,
held that they did not show that the non-staying of the judgment
would either render their appeals nugatory or make it impossible
for the party to conduct its primary for the forthcoming
governorship election.

The judge voided all the activities engaged in by the party
since June 9 when the judgment was delivered, including the
elections it conducted on June 10 and 11 to elect a three-man
ad-hoc ward delegate that would participate in the voting at the
primary of the PDP scheduled for June 26, 2021.

Justice Adeniyi said the statement made on June 9, by Secretary
of the PDP Anambra in which he disparaged the court and its
judgment was an affront to the court, adding that they do not
expect a court they have insulted to grant them an indulgence.

He said: “The first applicant (the PDP), which is the principal
party has maintained in the face of this court that its judgment is
null and void for want of jurisdiction. The same party cannot at
the same time seek equitable reliefs from the same court.

“A party that has no regard for the judgment of a court and
described it I derogatory terms to the whole world, as shown in
Exhibit C, cannot quietly return to the same court. to seek
equitable relief to stay the same judgment that it defied and
defiled.

“An assessment of the totality of the circumstances that have
been presented before me by the instant applications leads to only
one conclusion, which is that the applicants do not have an iota of
respect for the authority of this court, they issued a release to
embolden their members not to reckon with the judgment of the court
and followed it up by taking of definite contemptuous steps in
disregard of the court’s judgment.

“For them to come back with a motion for stay of execution and
injunction pending the determination of their appeal, in my view,
is a clear afterthought. I there say that no court worth its
authority will grant aany such application, no matter how well
presented and argued,” Justice Adeniyi said.

The June 9 judgment, which they sought to stay was on a suit
marked: HC/CV/774/2021 filed by Samuel Anyakolah (for himself and
all local government chairmen and ward executives that emerged from
the Anambra PDP congress conducted on November 28 and December 1,
2017 under the supervision of Sir Chukwudi Umeaba, as Acting
Chairman State Caretaker Committee).

The judge agreed with the plaintiff/claimant that the PDP
violated its constitution in the conduct of the Southeast zonal
congress of March March 6, 2021 and the appointments made
therein.

He declared among others, that “all congresses, designations or
appointments made by the first defendant (the PDP), with respect to
the positions of the state chairman, EXCO members and local
government chairmen, as contained in pages 14,15 and 16 of the
Southeast zonal congress brochure of 6th March 2021 are hereby
nullified and set aside.”

The judge ordered the PDP to henceforth, recognise and adopt
only the list of the already inaugurated party officers and
delegates that emerged from the Anambra PDP congresses conducted on
November 28, 2017 and December 1, 2017 validated by Senator France
Bent Ward Congress Appeal Panel report and Barrister Ukpai Ukairo
Local Government Appeal Panel report, under the supervision of Sir
Chukwudi Umeaba, who shall continue to act in the capacities for
which they were duly elected.

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin