3 min read 543 words 4 views
0
(0)

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit challenging
Femi Gbajabiamila’s eligibility to contest the recently-concluded
speakership election of the newly-inaugurated 9th House of
Representatives.

The Court’s records sighted by our correspondent on Tuesday
showed that Justice Inyang Ekwo dismissed the suit following the
decision of the plaintiff, Philip Undie, to discontinue the
case.

Undie had filed the legal action on May 21, 2019, asking the
court to remove Gbajabiamila as a member of the House of
Representatives and disqualify him from contesting the leadership
election of the House of Representatives.

He had anchored the suit on the alleged conviction of the
lawmaker for fraud and dishonesty by the Supreme Court of the State
of Georgia in the United States of America in 2007.

But a new lawyer engaged by the plaintiff, Mr. S.D Okoro,
appeared in court on Monday, to adopt a notice of discontinuance of
the suit earlier filed.

In response, Gbajabiamila’s lawyer, Mr. Femi Adedeji, of the law
firm of Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), said he had no objection to the
application for the discontinuance of the case.

But Adedeji prayed that his client, having joined issues with
the plaintiff by filing a counter-affidavit against the originating
summons and a preliminary object, the suit should not be struck
out, but should be dismissed so that it would not be re-filed in
the future.

He also prayed for a cost of N1m to be awarded against the
plaintiff.

Ruling, Justice Ekwo dismissed the suit as prayed by
Gbajabiamila’s lawyer, but refused to award cost against the
plaintiff.

The judge said, “On the last day of hearing of this case, Mr.
Okoro appeared for the plaintiff but there was no processes before
the court showing that there was a change of counsel before the
court.

“Today (Monday), I take notice of a process titled ‘Change of
counsel’ by Mr. Okoro dated June 20, 2019.

“Therefore, I am satisfied that Mr. Okoro has authority to
represent the plaintiff in this case and therefore entitled to
conduct the case in accordance with the law.

“Now, Mr. Okoro has adopted the notice of discontinuance dated
June 17, 2019, and this is happening after issues have been joined
in the substantive matter. Mr. Okoro is praying that the matter be
struck out.

“I have listened to Mr. Adedeji, counsel for the 1st defendant,
and on the consequential order to be made at this stage.

“It is the law that when parties have joined issues and the
plaintiff seeks to withdraw the case, the proper order is that
dismissing the suit.

“It is in this like that I agree with the learned counsel for
the 1st defendant, and I hereby make an order dismissing this
suit.

“On the issue of cost, I will not make any order as to cost
since parties decided to end the matter peacefully.

“I allow them to go home without grudges against each
other.”

image

In the suit, the plaintiff had alleged that Gbajabiamila, as a
practising lawyer in the State of Georgia in the US, “was convicted
and sentenced for fraud and dishonesty in relation to the sum of
$25,000” belonging to a then client of the lawmaker.

Subscribe ToNairalaw News!

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

By admin