2 min read 372 words 0 views
0
(0)

Who made the following completely blown prediction? Will anyone dare ask him about it?

And why doesn’t he talk about silver anymore? H’mm…

“A Timeline For The Next Rally In Gold”

“It’s still possible that gold could trade AS LOW as $1285 and back near its 50-day moving average before bottoming. This area has proven as support all year.”

“Then, finally, a breakout to new 2016 highs in October and November.”
“This year-end rally should take gold all the way back to near the April 2013 manipulated breakdown level of $1525. Let’s call it $1475-$1525.”

“So there you go. That’s what WE expect.
If I’M proven correct, I’LL gladly take all the ADULATION that comes this way. If WE’RE wrong…well, I’m not eating my hat again. That almost killed me last time.”

http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/7751/timeline-next-rally-gold
~~~~~~~~~~
ZERO CHANCE of $1200 gold? 

http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/comment/170246#comment-170246

http://www.pmaccountability.com

Vote up!

4
Vote down!

0 And the irony of a guy named Turd stating the following would make the pumper saying it a…(fill-in-blank)?   

“…all of the asswipes who claim that gold is going to $1050 will be DEAD WRONG.”

http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/comment/369826#comment-369826

I suppose when you’ve got nothing new or relevant to say you can always fallback on sophmoric humor and mock people’s names with silly ass rhymes or mock their appearance or clothing or speech mannerisms or engage in Seasame Street-like nonsense to distract others with a lame attempt at humor hoping no one notices what a wrong-way court jester he’s been.

I’m sure he’s in full blown excuse at this point saying things like price doesn’t matter a victory will be our’s blah, blah, blah. 

And he’s not the only one. The MOPB (management of perception blogging) in the metals blogosphere is about to try and explain it all away even if they need to use fiction and B.S. to accomplish just that.

B.S. is their M.O.


powered by sue.ng a legal search engine

.. ..

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?