5 min read 948 words 3 views
0
(0)

The Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against
Corruption (PACAC), Prof Itse Sagay (SAN), on Thursday backed
Acting President Yemi Osinbajo’s position that the Acting Chairman
of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim
Magu, would remain in office.

Sagay said the presidency’s position was anchored on the
provisions of the 1999 Constitution, which he said supersedes the
EFCC Act.

But, another lawyer Mallam Yusuf Ali (SAN), believed the
provision of the EFCC Act was valid, and that there would have been
no conflict with the Senate if the executive had complied with the
law.

Two other SANs, Prof Koyinsola Ajayi and Norrison Quakers,
called for caution and dialogue.

They spoke in separate telephone interviews with our
correspondents.

To Sagay, Section 2 (3) of the EFCC Act which provides that the
commission’s chairman’s appointment was subject to Senate
confirmation was void.

“The Section is absolutely void. A court doesn’t need to
pronounce it void. Every Nigerian can interpret the Constitution,
and the lawyers particularly can interpret it. There is no judge on
any Bench in Nigeria today that qualified before me. I am more
qualified than all of them and I qualified long before them. What
are they interpreting that I cannot?

“The truth is that the provision in EFCC Act and any other Act
that says the President must get clearance from the Senate before
appointing the heads of these agencies or an extra-ministerial body
is null and void.

“The Constitution has clearly provided for the President to so
appoint without any reference to the Senate. That is the law of
this country. The fact that we have been practicing invalid law
does not mean we cannot wake up one day and do the right thing,”
Sagay said.

On whether the EFCC Act’s provision needs to be amended, he
added: “No. You just ignore it. It doesn’t exist in law. It is
invalid, it is null and void.”

Sagay, however, said it was not a bad idea for the Supreme Court
to be called upon to resolve the impasse.

“It is not a bad idea for the Supreme Court to be asked to
intervene. But I’m telling you this is my interpretation. Any other
interpretation that is contrary to this is dishonest. It means they
have some private agenda that is contrary to the interest of
Nigerians in the face of clear provisions of the Constitution,” he
said.

Sagay praised Osinbajo for backing Magu.

He said: “Since the passage of our first leaders, like Awolowo,
Azikiwe and Ahmadu Bello, we have not been lucky enough to have
highly principled, consistent, committed men of great integrity and
honour like President Buhari and Vice President Osinbajo. Perhaps
the only other previous administration close to the present one is
the Murtala Mohammed/Obasanjo administration.”

The Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against
Corruption (PACAC), Prof Itse Sagay (SAN), on Thursday backed
Acting President Yemi Osinbajo’s position that the Acting Chairman
of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim
Magu, would remain in office.

Sagay said the presidency’s position was anchored on the
provisions of the 1999 Constitution, which he said supersedes the
EFCC Act.

But, another lawyer Mallam Yusuf Ali (SAN), believed the
provision of the EFCC Act was valid, and that there would have been
no conflict with the Senate if the executive had complied with the
law.

Two other SANs, Prof Koyinsola Ajayi and Norrison Quakers,
called for caution and dialogue.

They spoke in separate telephone interviews with our
correspondents.

To Sagay, Section 2 (3) of the EFCC Act which provides that the
commission’s chairman’s appointment was subject to Senate
confirmation was void.

“The Section is absolutely void. A court doesn’t need to
pronounce it void. Every Nigerian can interpret the Constitution,
and the lawyers particularly can interpret it. There is no judge on
any Bench in Nigeria today that qualified before me. I am more
qualified than all of them and I qualified long before them. What
are they interpreting that I cannot?

“The truth is that the provision in EFCC Act and any other Act
that says the President must get clearance from the Senate before
appointing the heads of these agencies or an extra-ministerial body
is null and void.

“The Constitution has clearly provided for the President to so
appoint without any reference to the Senate. That is the law of
this country. The fact that we have been practicing invalid law
does not mean we cannot wake up one day and do the right thing,”
Sagay said.

On whether the EFCC Act’s provision needs to be amended, he
added: “No. You just ignore it. It doesn’t exist in law. It is
invalid, it is null and void.”

Sagay, however, said it was not a bad idea for the Supreme Court
to be called upon to resolve the impasse.

“It is not a bad idea for the Supreme Court to be asked to
intervene. But I’m telling you this is my interpretation. Any other
interpretation that is contrary to this is dishonest. It means they
have some private agenda that is contrary to the interest of
Nigerians in the face of clear provisions of the Constitution,” he
said.

Sagay praised Osinbajo for backing Magu.

He said: “Since the passage of our first leaders, like Awolowo,
Azikiwe and Ahmadu Bello, we have not been lucky enough to have
highly principled, consistent, committed men of great integrity and
honour like President Buhari and Vice President Osinbajo. Perhaps
the only other previous administration close to the present one is
the Murtala Mohammed/Obasanjo administration.”

Read more

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?