A federal judge dismissed the United States women’s soccer
team’s bid for equal pay on Friday, rejecting claims the players
had been underpaid in a crushing defeat for the reigning world
champions.
In a 32-page ruling, Judge Gary Klausner of the US District
Court for Central California in Los Angeles tossed the women’s
claim of pay discrimination, ruling in favour of the United States
Soccer Federation (USSF).
Klausner did allow the women’s case for unfair treatment in
areas such as travel, housing and medical support to proceed to
trial, set for June 16 in Los Angeles.
But the judge said the equal pay claims — the central plank of
the case — had been dismissed because there was evidence the women
had previously turned down an offer in the Collective Bargaining
Agreement negotiations to be paid along the lines of the US men’s
team.
“The history of negotiations between the parties demonstrates
that the WNT rejected an offer to be paid under the same
pay-to-play structure as the MNT, and the WNT was willing to forgo
higher bonuses for benefits, such as greater base compensation and
the guarantee of a higher number of contracted players,” Klausner
wrote.
“Accordingly, plaintiffs cannot now retroactively deem their CBA
(collective bargaining agreement) worse than the MNT CBA by
reference to what they would have made had they been paid under the
MNT’s pay-to-play terms structure when they themselves rejected
such a structure,” he said.
– ‘Shocked and disappointed’ –
The US women were left stunned by their defeat on the pay issue.
The women had been seeking back pay of $66 million under the Equal
Pay Act.
Prominent US women’s team star Megan Rapinoe said after learning
of the court’s decision that the battle is not over.
“We will never stop fighting for EQUALITY,” she wrote on
Twitter.
A spokeswoman for the players reacted with dismay following
Friday’s ruling.
“We are shocked and disappointed with today’s decision, but we
will not give up our hard work for equal pay,” spokeswoman Molly
Levinson said.
“We are confident in our case and steadfast in our commitment to
ensuring that girls and women who play this sport will not be
valued as lesser just because of their gender.
“We have learned that there are tremendous obstacles to change;
we know that it takes bravery and courage and perseverance to stand
up to them.”
USSF said Friday night it would continue to work with the
women’s program to grow the game in the United States.
“We look forward to working with the Women’s National Team to
chart a positive path forward and to grow the game both here at
home and around the world,” it said.
“We are committed to continuing that work to ensure our Women’s
National Team remains the best in the world.”
The increasingly acrimonious lawsuit had taken a dramatic turn
in March, when a filing by lawyers for the federation argued that
US men’s team players required a “higher level of skill based on
speed and strength” than the women.
The filing triggered outrage amongst the women’s players while
influential sponsors such as Coca-Cola voiced disgust at the
remarks.
USSF President Carlos Cordeiro later resigned following the
uproar, with Rapinoe accusing the USSF of “blatant sexism” in its
legal filings.
The US women, who clinched back-to-back World Cup wins with
victory at last year’s finals in France, had based their claim for
back pay in the disparities between prize money distributed by FIFA
at the men’s and women’s World Cups.
Germany’s men won $35 million for their victory in the 2014
World Cup while France earned $38 million after triumphing in
Russia in 2018.
The United States women, victors in the 2015 and 2019 World
Cups, earned total prize money of $6 million over the two
tournaments.
The USSF argued in court that between the years 2015-2019, the
women actually were paid more money than the men on both a
cumulative and an average per game basis.
During that period the women’s national team received $24
million and an average of $220,747 per game while the men’s team
received payments of $18 million and $212,639 per game.
Under the current CBA, which was signed in 2017, more than half
the women’s team players receive an annual base salary of $167,000.
(AFP)
A federal judge dismissed the United States women’s soccer
team’s bid for equal pay on Friday, rejecting claims the players
had been underpaid in a crushing defeat for the reigning world
champions.
In a 32-page ruling, Judge Gary Klausner of the US District
Court for Central California in Los Angeles tossed the women’s
claim of pay discrimination, ruling in favour of the United States
Soccer Federation (USSF).
Klausner did allow the women’s case for unfair treatment in
areas such as travel, housing and medical support to proceed to
trial, set for June 16 in Los Angeles.
But the judge said the equal pay claims — the central plank of
the case — had been dismissed because there was evidence the women
had previously turned down an offer in the Collective Bargaining
Agreement negotiations to be paid along the lines of the US men’s
team.
“The history of negotiations between the parties demonstrates
that the WNT rejected an offer to be paid under the same
pay-to-play structure as the MNT, and the WNT was willing to forgo
higher bonuses for benefits, such as greater base compensation and
the guarantee of a higher number of contracted players,” Klausner
wrote.
“Accordingly, plaintiffs cannot now retroactively deem their CBA
(collective bargaining agreement) worse than the MNT CBA by
reference to what they would have made had they been paid under the
MNT’s pay-to-play terms structure when they themselves rejected
such a structure,” he said.
– ‘Shocked and disappointed’ –
The US women were left stunned by their defeat on the pay issue.
The women had been seeking back pay of $66 million under the Equal
Pay Act.
Prominent US women’s team star Megan Rapinoe said after learning
of the court’s decision that the battle is not over.
“We will never stop fighting for EQUALITY,” she wrote on
Twitter.
A spokeswoman for the players reacted with dismay following
Friday’s ruling.
“We are shocked and disappointed with today’s decision, but we
will not give up our hard work for equal pay,” spokeswoman Molly
Levinson said.
“We are confident in our case and steadfast in our commitment to
ensuring that girls and women who play this sport will not be
valued as lesser just because of their gender.
“We have learned that there are tremendous obstacles to change;
we know that it takes bravery and courage and perseverance to stand
up to them.”
USSF said Friday night it would continue to work with the
women’s program to grow the game in the United States.
“We look forward to working with the Women’s National Team to
chart a positive path forward and to grow the game both here at
home and around the world,” it said.
“We are committed to continuing that work to ensure our Women’s
National Team remains the best in the world.”
The increasingly acrimonious lawsuit had taken a dramatic turn
in March, when a filing by lawyers for the federation argued that
US men’s team players required a “higher level of skill based on
speed and strength” than the women.
The filing triggered outrage amongst the women’s players while
influential sponsors such as Coca-Cola voiced disgust at the
remarks.
USSF President Carlos Cordeiro later resigned following the
uproar, with Rapinoe accusing the USSF of “blatant sexism” in its
legal filings.
The US women, who clinched back-to-back World Cup wins with
victory at last year’s finals in France, had based their claim for
back pay in the disparities between prize money distributed by FIFA
at the men’s and women’s World Cups.
Germany’s men won $35 million for their victory in the 2014
World Cup while France earned $38 million after triumphing in
Russia in 2018.
The United States women, victors in the 2015 and 2019 World
Cups, earned total prize money of $6 million over the two
tournaments.
The USSF argued in court that between the years 2015-2019, the
women actually were paid more money than the men on both a
cumulative and an average per game basis.
During that period the women’s national team received $24
million and an average of $220,747 per game while the men’s team
received payments of $18 million and $212,639 per game.
Under the current CBA, which was signed in 2017, more than half
the women’s team players receive an annual base salary of $167,000.
(AFP)