Buhari, Malami Give Reason For Extending Mohammed Adamu’s Stay As IGP

–As lack of service stalls hearing of suit seeking Adamu’s
removal

President Muhammadu Buhari has said the constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria gives him the power to extend the
tenure of Mohammed Adamu as Inspector General of Police (IGP).

It would be recalled that an Abuja-based lawyer, Maxwell Okpara
had approached a Federal High Court in Abuja with a suit seeking to
stop Adamu from parading himself as the IGP.

Okpara joined the president, IGP Adamu, Attorney General of the
Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) and
the Nigeria Police Council as defendants in the suit.

But, President Buhari and Malami, in a counter-affidavit filed
on March 15, 2021, said, in the exercise of the executive power
conferred on the president by the constitution, he can appoint a
serving police officer as the IGP in consultation with the Police
Council.

The counter-affidavit deposed to by a litigation clerk in the
Federal Ministry of Justice, Thomas Etah said, it is a fact that
extension of the tenure of any public officer is conferred on the
president and Adamu is a public officer.

According to the president, the Police Council and the Police
Service Commission have not disclosed any contrary fact that Adamu
is not a serving police officer.

He said: “The Nigeria Police Act 2020 is a subsidiary
legislation passed by the National Assembly and the appointment of
an IGP is by the constitution, conferred on the President of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

President Buhari and Malami, who are 1st and 3rd defendants in
the suit, therefore, prayed the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s
suit with a heavy cost for being frivolous, unmeritorious and
undeserving of the time of the court.

–Lack of service stalls hearing of suit seeking Adamu’s
removal
Meanwhile, lack of service of court processes on the Nigeria Police
Council on Tuesday stalled the hearing of a suit seeking Adamu’s
removal from office.

At the resumed hearing of the matter on Tuesday, counsel to the
plaintiff, Ezikiel Ugochukwu, asked the court for a stand-down of
proceedings for 45 minutes to enable him to file his response to
the counter-affidavit of the 1st and 3rd respondents.

He said the respondents, in their various counter-affidavit,
raised the issue of jurisdiction of the court to entertain the
matter.

But, counsel to the IGP, Dr Alex Izinyon (SAN), in his response
said there was no need for the plaintiff to ask for a stand-down as
he was within time to file his response.

However, hearing in the matter could not go on as the 4th
respondent (Police council) was not represented in court as the
findings of the court showed that they were not served with hearing
notice on the matter.

According to the trial judge, Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed,
“looking at the Originating Summons and hearing notice, it is clear
that there is doubt that the 4th defendant was not served.

“To be on the safer side, this matter has to be adjourned to
enable service on the 4th defendant,” he said.

The judge then adjourned the matter till March 30, 2021, to
enable service of court processes on the 4th defendant, who should
file and serve a response within seven days.

Okpara is also asking the court to restrain Adamu from
exercising any form of command over officers of the
Nigeria Police Force.

He argued that Adamu’s tenure has elapsed on February 1, 2021,
by virtue of the Police Act.

According to him, Adamu completed his tenure on February 1,
2021, after completing 35 years in office as Nigeria Police
required by the Act.

In the originating summons numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/106/2021, the
plaintiff wants the court to determine whether by provisions
section 215, 216 and section 7 of the Nigeria Police Act 2020,
Adamu can continue to function as IG after February 1, 2021.

He also wants the court to determine whether the failure of
President Buhari and the Nigeria Police Council to appoint another
IGP does not constitute an abdication of their duties.

A10-paragraph affidavit deposed to by the plaintiff (Maxwell
Okpara), stated that though, Adamu is no longer a serving police
officer but has continued to function in that capacity.

The plaintiff urged the court to determine if the continued stay
in office by Adamu has not breached the provisions of the
Constitution and the Nigerian Police Act and prayed the court to
declare as illegal, null and void all actions taken by Adamu from
midnight of February 1, 2021.

–As lack of service stalls hearing of suit seeking Adamu’s
removal

President Muhammadu Buhari has said the constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria gives him the power to extend the
tenure of Mohammed Adamu as Inspector General of Police (IGP).

It would be recalled that an Abuja-based lawyer, Maxwell Okpara
had approached a Federal High Court in Abuja with a suit seeking to
stop Adamu from parading himself as the IGP.

Okpara joined the president, IGP Adamu, Attorney General of the
Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) and
the Nigeria Police Council as defendants in the suit.

But, President Buhari and Malami, in a counter-affidavit filed
on March 15, 2021, said, in the exercise of the executive power
conferred on the president by the constitution, he can appoint a
serving police officer as the IGP in consultation with the Police
Council.

The counter-affidavit deposed to by a litigation clerk in the
Federal Ministry of Justice, Thomas Etah said, it is a fact that
extension of the tenure of any public officer is conferred on the
president and Adamu is a public officer.

According to the president, the Police Council and the Police
Service Commission have not disclosed any contrary fact that Adamu
is not a serving police officer.

He said: “The Nigeria Police Act 2020 is a subsidiary
legislation passed by the National Assembly and the appointment of
an IGP is by the constitution, conferred on the President of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

President Buhari and Malami, who are 1st and 3rd defendants in
the suit, therefore, prayed the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s
suit with a heavy cost for being frivolous, unmeritorious and
undeserving of the time of the court.

–Lack of service stalls hearing of suit seeking Adamu’s
removal
Meanwhile, lack of service of court processes on the Nigeria Police
Council on Tuesday stalled the hearing of a suit seeking Adamu’s
removal from office.

At the resumed hearing of the matter on Tuesday, counsel to the
plaintiff, Ezikiel Ugochukwu, asked the court for a stand-down of
proceedings for 45 minutes to enable him to file his response to
the counter-affidavit of the 1st and 3rd respondents.

He said the respondents, in their various counter-affidavit,
raised the issue of jurisdiction of the court to entertain the
matter.

But, counsel to the IGP, Dr Alex Izinyon (SAN), in his response
said there was no need for the plaintiff to ask for a stand-down as
he was within time to file his response.

However, hearing in the matter could not go on as the 4th
respondent (Police council) was not represented in court as the
findings of the court showed that they were not served with hearing
notice on the matter.

According to the trial judge, Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed,
“looking at the Originating Summons and hearing notice, it is clear
that there is doubt that the 4th defendant was not served.

“To be on the safer side, this matter has to be adjourned to
enable service on the 4th defendant,” he said.

The judge then adjourned the matter till March 30, 2021, to
enable service of court processes on the 4th defendant, who should
file and serve a response within seven days.

Okpara is also asking the court to restrain Adamu from
exercising any form of command over officers of the
Nigeria Police Force.

He argued that Adamu’s tenure has elapsed on February 1, 2021,
by virtue of the Police Act.

According to him, Adamu completed his tenure on February 1,
2021, after completing 35 years in office as Nigeria Police
required by the Act.

In the originating summons numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/106/2021, the
plaintiff wants the court to determine whether by provisions
section 215, 216 and section 7 of the Nigeria Police Act 2020,
Adamu can continue to function as IG after February 1, 2021.

He also wants the court to determine whether the failure of
President Buhari and the Nigeria Police Council to appoint another
IGP does not constitute an abdication of their duties.

A10-paragraph affidavit deposed to by the plaintiff (Maxwell
Okpara), stated that though, Adamu is no longer a serving police
officer but has continued to function in that capacity.

The plaintiff urged the court to determine if the continued stay
in office by Adamu has not breached the provisions of the
Constitution and the Nigerian Police Act and prayed the court to
declare as illegal, null and void all actions taken by Adamu from
midnight of February 1, 2021.