Nigerians Can Sue FG For Interfering In Their Business Relationship With Twitter

6 min read 1,116 words 2 views

It is possible for Nigerians who conduct their business on
Twitter to sue the Federal Government (FG) for interfering in their
business relationship with Twitter.

This is according to Professor Fidelis Oditah, President,
International Law Association, Nigeria.

Professor Oditah said this while answering questions on an Arise
News television programme aired on Wednesday.

Reacting to the claim by Lai Mohammed, the Minister of
Information, that Twitter and its owner Jack Dorsey are liable for
losses incurred during the EndSARS protest, Professor Fidelis
Oditah a Queen’s Counsel and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN),
said: “It is difficult to see the basis of any such claim. As I
understand what Mr Lai Mohammed is saying, he has suggested that
Jack Dorsey the founder of Twitter did three acts which
individually and collectively constitute wrongdoing and that
Twitter is somehow vicariously liable for the acts of Mr Jack
Dorsey.

“What I’d like to do is to look at the three acts or actions
which Lai Mohammed relies on.

“The first he says is that Jack Dorsey raised some funds through
bitcoins to sponsor the EndSARS protest of last year.

“Secondly, he says that Jack Dorsey retweeted some posts by some
coalitions that were sympathetic to the EndSARS protests.

“And finally, he says that Jack Dorsey launched an emoji which
gave greater visibility to the EndSARS protests on the
microblogging site.

“Now it is clear to me that individually and collectively those
three acts do not constitute any form of wrongdoing at all.

“As you must be aware, many Nigerians donated to the EndSARS
movement. I am not aware of anyone who has pursued any of them for
donating money to the EndSARS protest.

“Secondly, to retweet a post by itself is not a tort I am aware
of.

“Neither is it a tort to launch an emoji to give greater
visibility to the EndSARS on the Twitter site.

He added that the “claims appear to be hopeless at least on the
basis of the facts we know about.”

The QC also stated that he was not sure of the relationship
between Jack Dorsey and Twitter other than that he is the founder,
or if Dorsey is involved in the day to day running of Twitter.

“In order to make someone vicariously liable you have to
establish first of all a relationship requirement,” Oditah
said.

On the economic impact of the 40 million Nigerians who use
Twitter: 20 per cent of who use Twitter for business, 18 per cent
for job hunting, and 45 per cent are unemployed youth, Oditah was
asked if a class action against the government was a possibility by
Nigerians whose businesses had been affected.

The SAN said, “They should sue the Federal Government and Mr Lai
Mohammed, and they should sue them for intentional interference
with their business relationships.

“So if someone has a business relationship with Twitter, and is
able to conduct his or her own business on Twitter, the government
action in deliberately banning Twitter which itself is wrongful
might in certain circumstances give a Twitter user a cause of
action against the government.

“And I think the government needs to behave more responsibly and
to distinguish matters of personal ego from what is in the
collective public interest.”